Land-subjectivity, according to the view of Orianist existentialism view, introduces the approach of synergistic existence (i. e., existence beyond synergy). Existential coexistence (Existence beyond coexistence) Beyond the coherence of areas is the form of the existence of an being that transcends any dualism that is specific to humanist philosophy,Therefore, in examining the opposition between the two views of Land-subjectivity and humansubjectivity, by introducing a critical posthumanist and Faratradition attitude in the view of the originality of the land, the selfbased and permanently oriented man who always emphasizes dualism and objectivism in humanist philosophy Is criticized. In this view, it is also stated that it is fundamentally wrong to separate the two approaches of existence and being,The existence of the earth is always dependent on its beings, and this existence would not have any meaning without the existence of a homogeneous pair,Thus, omnipresence has multiple domains of existence that believe in the pairing of phenomena, not their dualism. Also, this article, which was done in a descriptive-analytical method by using library resources, examines the attitude of ecofeminism. In this view, woman and earth are considered one. Of course, the Landsubjectivity view, with regard to the critical point of view of Farafeminism and humanistic feminist and masculine-approaches, Of course, the geopolitical view, with regard to the critical point of view of extra-feminism and the feminist and masculine-humanistic approach, proposes existential equality, not existential analogy. It also introduces the naturalistic literature and states that the attitude of the originality of the earth (Land-subjectivity) always follows the two basic elements of no dualism and no adjectives.

In traditional, modern and postmodern literature, we have always encountered a category called woman. In our classical literature, a woman was a beloved with the same height as a cypress, eyebrows like a bow, etc., who in the best of circumstances met her lover in a pub. In the modern period and to a lesser extent in the postmodern period, women poets took critical approaches to the position of women in literature and society. It is important to note that society and, consequently, literature have long regarded women as a tool for society and poetry and have always written about them,But the approach of post-feminism in society and literature, with a critical approach to all dualisms and instrumentalists about women, presents a critical view of post-Humanism in which women are seen as the romantic half of human on earth and in literature, especially in naturalistic literature, women are allowed to without denying, rejecting and humiliating the other half of human, that is the man,appear as an independent and unmediated character in society and poetry without having to deal with presuppositions, criticisms, judgments, etc. This article is a descriptive-analytical method compiled using library resources, aims to enable each of the male and female phenomena in literature to have an independent presence in the text immediately and independently of all ideological and theological views, and to narrate themselves in the world of text. The aim is to enable each of the male and female phenomena in literature to have an independent presence in the text immediately and independently of all ideological and theological views, and to flow in the text and to narrate themselves in the world of text.

Feminism is a naturalistic view that considers the gender to be prior to existence. Fara-feminism is a view that prioritizes human existence over all sexist views, but does not denigrate, diminish, or deny gender. That is, Fara-feminism has a feminist, humanistic perspective. In this descriptive-analytical study using library resources, we seek to answer the question of what is Fara-feminism and what does it have to do with the Fara-structuralist linguistic approach? The study found that Fara-feminism is a system based on seven collective-individual consciousness-unconscious spatial, temporal, linguistic, racial genetics, cultural, intellectual, mediaindividual collective consciousness and subconscious as well as psychosexual self-consciousness and the subconscious. Moreover, Fara-feminism is also a branch of the Fara-structuralist School of Philosophy-Linguistics, and just as it considers the word to transcend all textual and grammatical structures, it also considers human existence to transcend all racial, psychosexual, spatial, temporal, and linguistic structures.

Humanism in modern western civilization is a fundamental idea. Underlying root, perhaps, in contradiction of the contemporary West with the Iran Islamic Revolution hidden in the humanistic nature of modernity, since the modern west pivotal view in all dimensions of life is humanistic, and human-like rather than God-oriented one. To this aim, a critical method used. Humanism has two meanings: first, the humans’ rights, kept and their dignity and then, attach prime importance to humans on all grounds. Based on the first, it reduces the possibility of Humanism criticism and will display only as an indisputable fact in the past and the present. Humanism term employment of the outside its life domain, along with appendixes such as Islamic, etc. is unnecessary and even forged and incorrect. Concerning the second interpretation, Humanism can cultivate from two aspects. First, from the viewpoint of intra thought school and then, from the perspective of inter thought school. Fundamental self-contradiction (either in theory dimension or in practice dimension), is the most basic fault that has made the humanoriented thought school facing crises. The unjust extension of Humanism to the outside of its life forms the most basic inter critique of thought school.

In structuralism, poststructuralism and deconstruction, the emphasis is on the accident of language and words. However, in the school of Fara-structuralist linguistics, words have multiple essences that have a multiplicity of beings in the Ma-Dar-Ma (The invented word by Arash Azarpeik-The school of word originality) system of existence, and since structuralists consider language as a subject and a subjective thing, in this regard, we will examine the subjectivity of language and the objectivity of text. The purpose of this article is to examine the question of whether words are substance or the accident and language of the subject or object. And then we will critique and analyze the views of linguists and philosophers in this regard, and finally we will examine this view in Fara-structuralist linguistics and we will find that if the word is given originality and every area of language is considered a matter of logos and consider semantic essence as a Fara-dimensional, Fara-spatial and Fara-temporal matter, so language is not a study of form or accident, but a study of the types of essences of a word and can appear in different forms. Thus, Fara-structuralist linguistics accepts language as a Fara-subject, and critiques the duality of signifier and signified about words, and believes in body and soul, which is a profound truth about words.

In the review of literary approaches and the creation of attitudinal and writing systems, we are faced with four paradigms. That is, reduction-addition systems, eclectic systems, system-likes, and additive-concrete systems. While presenting this division, Arash Azarpeyk considers the horizontal, pragmatic as well as problematic presentation by this concept to be the reason for it, Therefore, in this article, by examining these four systems, we will state that the approach of ecofeminism is an eclectic approach that always tries to consider women and the earth as oppressed phenomena in patriarchal systems. The critical approach of Farafeminism, with regard to the additive-concrete system, beyond all limited frameworks of women-oriented and men-oriented, seeks to present the division of different type of subjects from Azarpeyk's point of view and believes that by changing the male subject to a female subject, ecofeminism is trying to categorize all existences including the earth-in a hierarchical approach and in another field, with a female-oriented view. In naturalistic literature, According to the two fundamental principles of "absence of any dualism" and "absence of any attribution", the principle and foundation of Earthsubjectivity in Orianism is proposed. Earth-subjectivity is a critical approach to all the ideas in which man is known as the identical subject who is always seeking valuation. In this article, which is done in a descriptive and analytical method by using library resources, the naturalistic literature is examined with regard to the approach of the third genus and the presentation of human-centered feminism and human-centered patriarchy ideas.